Real Cheap Pandora Jewelry

Girls in Sexist Societies Worse at Math

For decades, researchers and educators have debated why boys tend to perform better than girls in math. Are men naturally more logical creatures and thus better at scientific http://www.pacharms-jewelry.us/  endeavors? Are girls not encouraged by their families, their friends or society at large to pursue scientific careers?

Researchers believe they may have found at least one answer: where girls live. Also, "there is a much higher gender gap in reading. Girls become much better in reading" in these countries.

Click here to see more detailed information.

To conduct the study, Sapienza, along with Luigi Guiso at the Instituto Universitario Europeo and Ferdinando Monte and Luigi Zingales at the University of Chicago, examined  Pandora Necklaces  boys' and girls' test scores worldwide on the same test, using data from the Programme for International Test Assessment. The program provided its 2003 test data from more than 276,000 students from 40 countries around the world.

According to that data, girls worldwide scored on average 10.5 points lower than boys (or 2 percent lower than boys) in math. In reading, on average, girls outscored boys by 32.7 points (or 6.6 percent higher than boys).

The United States fell in line with the worldwide average. In the United States, American  http://pacharms-jewelry.us girls scored 9.8 points lower than boys in math.

"These are what we called the gender gaps in math and in reading," Sapienza said.

Generally, there are two explanations for the gender gap in math, according to Sapienza: biological and environmental. The  Pandora Jewelry Store biological reasoning says that boys are naturally better in math based on research involving spatial tests.

"It's not very strong evidence because we don't have strong correlation between spatial abilities and math scores," she said.

The environmental-based reasoning posits that girls don't perform as well in math because there Pandora Bracelets aren't enough societal incentives to go into science.

Sapienza and her colleagues then parsed the test data by country; in certain countries, the gender gap didn't hold up and the team wondered why.